Research Ethics/Article Retraction

Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality & Social Psychology Review (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 2(3), 196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4

Lishner, D. A. (2021). HARKing: Conceptualizations, harms, and two fundamental remedies. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000182

Hollenbeck, J. R., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Harking, Sharking, and Tharking: Making the Case for Post Hoc Analysis of Scientific Data. Journal of Management, 43(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679487

Retraction Watch, Alison McCook, 12/4/2015

Marlies van Lent, Joanna IntHout, Henk Jan Out,
Differences between information in registries and articles did not influence publication acceptance,
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 68, no.9, 2015, p.1059-1067, ISSN 0895-4356, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.019

For my next trick... Clinical trials. (2016, March 26). The Economist, 418(8982), 85(US). https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A449087962/ITOF?u=morenetsbumc&sid=ITOF&xid=209c5f5a

Psychology Today, Christopher Lane, 4/30/2016

#ME Action Encyclopedia (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis)

Falk Delgado, A., & Falk Delgado, A. (2017). Outcome switching in randomized controlled oncology trials reporting on surrogate endpoints: a cross-sectional analysis. Scientific reports, 7(1), 9206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09553-y

TranspariMED, blog post byTill Bruckner, 2/2024

The COMPare Trials Project. Goldacre B, Drysdale H, Powell-Smith A, et al. www.COMPare-trials.org, 2016

Retraction Watch Augustine Brannigan, 6/9/2021
Summary: discusses replicability, hypothesizing after the results are known, and verification bias.